🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". A law is expected to be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the local level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation continues, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states globally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.